This page reproduces proposal text and published results preserved from Snapshot. It reflects the archive capture below.
Archive capture completed:
Published voting information
State at capture
closed
Voting type
basic
Created
2024-03-14 01:27:53 UTC
Voting opened
2024-03-14 01:27:52 UTC
Voting closed
2024-03-28 01:27:52 UTC
Snapshot block
19429983
Participation score
10823.112341321237
Published quorum
7348
Quorum type
default
Recorded ballots
225
Published choice scores
Choice
Score
For
10420.554015119847
Against
20.90518552628813
Abstain
381.6531406750993
Preserved proposal text
Original text, including Markdown notation. Linked content is not reproduced here.
RPIP-40 replaces RPIP-26 which describes the guiding principles, selection of, operation of, and governance of the Grants and Bounties Management Committee. RPIP-40 includes changes that increase the GMC's operational efficiency.
## Changes
- Revise the conflict of interest section to allow GMC members to participate in grants that have not been identified as competing grants
- Add additional clarity on GMC members participating in bounties
- Adjust where the application deadline falls within the schedule to improve consistency
- Restore the 'Selection and Governance' section that was unintentionally removed in RPIP-26
## Rationale
The conflict of interests section does not allow GMC members to fulfill their regular duties, and it has been a recurring issue for the GMC. Under this rule, the GMC has hit periods where it has been forced to make less informed decisions with fewer committee members present. Other changes make minor improvements to efficiency and fix issues introduced in the last update.
## Outcomes
If this passes, it replaces RPIP-26 with RPIP-40, which will make minor changes to how the GMC operates.
Please read the full RPIP [here](https://rpips.rocketpool.net/RPIPs/RPIP-40).
## Further context
* [Forum post with poll](https://dao.rocketpool.net/t/gmc-updates-proposal/2750)
* [Previous forum discussion](https://dao.rocketpool.net/t/gmc-rpip-18-conflict-of-interest-community-feedback/1959)